header image
Home
News - Νέα
Pontus - Πόντος
History - Ιστορία
Dictionary - Λεξιλόγιο
Dialect - Διάλεκτος
Genocide - Γενοκτονία
Photos - Φωτογραφίες
Poetry - Ποιήματα
Books - Βιβλία
Films - Έργα
Music-Μουσική
Dances - Χοροί
The Arts - Τέχνη
Links - Συνδέσεις
Archive - Αρχείο
Subscribe
Contact Us

im

im

im

im
 
img
     
img
 
 im
 
im
  

im

 im

im

im

 im

 im

im

im

im

im

im

im

im

 im

im
 

 
im
 
im
   
im
 
im
 

  im
Art and Identity in Thirteenth-Century Byzantium
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 

Image

Hagia Sophia and the Empire of Trebizond
The church of Hagia Sophia in Trebizond, built by the emperor Manuel I Grand Komnenos (1238-63) in the aftermath of the fall of Constantinople to the Fourth Crusade, is the finest surviving Byzantine imperial monument of its period. Art and Identity in Thirteenth-Century Byzantium is the first investigation of the church in more than thirty years, and is extensively illustrated in colour and black-and-white, with many images that have never previously been published.


ART AND IDENTITY IN THIRTEENTH-CENTURY BYZANTIUM:
HAGIA SOPHIA AND THE EMPIRE OF TREBIZOND

Birmingham Byzantine and Ottoman Monographs

Antony Eastmond

208 pages

 

Image

Buy it from Amazon.com

Antony Eastmond examines the architectural, sculptural and painted decorations of the church, placing them in the context of contemporary developments elsewhere in the Byzantine world, in Seljuq Anatolia and among the Caucasian neighbours of Trebizond. Knowledge of this area has been transformed in the last twenty years, following the collapse of the Soviet Union. The new evidence that has emerged enables a radically different interpretation of the church to be reached, and raises questions of cultural interchange on the borders of the Christian and Muslim worlds of eastern Anatolia, the Caucasus and Persia.

This study uses the church and its decoration to examine questions of Byzantine identity and imperial ideology in the thirteenth century. This is central to any understanding of the period, as the fall of Constantinople in 1204 divided the Byzantine empire and forced the successor states in Nicaea, Epiros and Trebizond to redefine their concepts of empire in exile. Art is here exploited as significant historical evidence for the nature of imperial power in a contested empire. It is suggested that imperial identity was determined as much by craftsmen and expectations of imperial power as by the emperor's decree; and that this was a credible alternative Byzantine identity to that developed in the empire of Nicaea.

About the Author
Antony Eastmond is Reader in the History of Byzantine Art at the Courtauld Institute of Art, University of London, UK

 

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

im

Image

Image
 
Image
 
Image
 
Image
  
Image

 Image
 
Image
          
Image
 
Image
       
Image
  
Image
 
Δι.Συ.Π.Ε the body that represents Pontic Greeks worldwide has been a...
  
We have 17 guests online